What Did CySEC Decide?
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission has reached a €120,000 settlement with Zorivo Ltd following an investigation into the firm’s regulatory compliance, according to a board decision dated Jan. 19 and published on Jan. 30. The settlement addresses two separate areas of concern: authorization requirements for investment services and the firm’s conduct during a regulatory inspection.
While the CySEC decision does not name any commercial brands, websites, or trading names operated by Zorivo, public corporate registry records provide insight into the company’s market-facing activities.
Multiple Cyprus corporate registry aggregators list ZORIVO LIMITED under Cyprus registration number ΗΕ 389949. The same registration number is also associated in public records with the company name FP MARKETS (CY) LTD.
In addition, Cyprus’s Official Gazette shows a corporate name-change record in which SAMCRO LIMITED changed its name to FP MARKETS (CY) LTD on 26 August 2023, referencing registration number ΗΕ 389949.
CySEC said the settlement was concluded under Article 37(4) of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission Law, which allows the regulator to resolve suspected violations without pursuing formal enforcement proceedings where there are reasonable grounds to believe a breach may have occurred. The regulator stressed that settlements do not constitute an admission of guilt and are used as an administrative mechanism rather than a judicial one.
The total amount has been paid in full by Zorivo, with all funds directed to the Treasury of the Republic of Cyprus rather than retained by the regulator.
Investor Takeaway
Why Authorization Was Central to the Case
The larger portion of the settlement, €70,000, relates to a possible breach of Article 5(1) of the Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law of 2017. This provision requires firms to hold proper authorization before providing regulated investment services and to operate strictly within the scope of that authorization.
CySEC’s review covered a period from February 2024 through July 2025, indicating sustained supervisory attention rather than a short-term compliance lapse. Although the regulator did not publish operational details, enforcement actions under Article 5(1) commonly arise when firms provide services beyond their approved activities, act ahead of formal authorization, or rely on group or third-party arrangements that weaken regulatory oversight.
Authorization breaches are treated as serious matters under Cyprus law because they go to the core of investor protection. Firms operating outside licensed boundaries may bypass capital requirements, governance checks, or conduct rules that apply to authorized entities.
By settling the matter, CySEC avoided a formal ruling while still recording the issue publicly, a pattern that has become more common in recent supervisory actions.
Inspection Failures Triggered a Separate Settlement
A second settlement of €50,000 was reached over possible violations of Articles 34(7) and 32(3) of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission Law. These provisions require regulated firms to cooperate fully with supervisory inspections and to provide complete and accurate information when requested.
According to CySEC, the issues arose during an on-site inspection carried out on July 31, 2025, and a subsequent formal information request dated Sept. 2, 2025. The regulator said Zorivo failed to ensure timely, complete, and accurate responses during both stages of the process.
On-site inspections are a key supervisory tool used to test whether firms’ records, controls, and governance arrangements align with regulatory filings. Shortcomings during such reviews are treated as standalone concerns, regardless of whether underlying misconduct is ultimately established.
The fact that CySEC pursued a distinct settlement for inspection conduct highlights the weight it places on cooperation. From the regulator’s perspective, incomplete or delayed responses undermine its ability to supervise firms effectively.
Investor Takeaway
Why There Was No Court Ruling
CySEC confirmed that the settlement involved no judicial review and resulted in no formal ruling. In Cyprus, court challenges are more commonly pursued when firms face license suspension or withdrawal. Administrative settlements are typically used where regulators believe issues can be addressed without escalating into adversarial proceedings.
This approach allows CySEC to conclude cases more quickly while still placing compliance failures on the public record. It also reduces legal uncertainty for firms, though at the cost of reputational exposure.
The Zorivo case fits within a broader pattern of enforcement that relies on settlements paired with disclosure rather than lengthy litigation.
What This Means for Cyprus-Based Firms
The settlement comes amid wider pressure on CySEC to strengthen supervision, particularly around authorization boundaries and inspection outcomes. European supervisory bodies have repeatedly urged the regulator to show consistent oversight of investment firms operating from Cyprus, which remains a major hub for EU-passportable financial services.
While the €120,000 total is modest by European enforcement standards, the extended review period and the combination of authorization and cooperation issues suggest heightened supervisory attention. Firms operating from Cyprus are being reminded that unclear authorization status and incomplete engagement with inspectors carry financial and reputational consequences.
CySEC did not disclose whether additional remedial steps were required as part of the settlement. However, firms involved in such cases often remain under closer monitoring following resolution.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or legal advice. Cryptocurrencies, memecoins, and prediction-market positions are highly speculative and involve significant risk, including the potential loss of all capital.
The analysis presented reflects the author’s opinion at the time of writing and is based on publicly available information, on-chain data, and market observations, which may change without notice. No representation or warranty is made regarding accuracy, completeness, or future performance.
Readers are solely responsible for their investment decisions and should conduct their own independent research and consult a qualified financial professional before engaging in any trading or betting activity. The author and publisher hold no responsibility for any financial losses incurred.