PayPal wants consumers and merchants to recognize and hold PYUSD. Stripe increasingly wants stablecoins to disappear into the financial infrastructure underneath payments. The more powerful model depends on whether the next phase of stablecoins is won by a monetary brand or by the platform that makes the token irrelevant.

Stablecoin strategy is becoming a useful test of how two payment companies think the future of money will be distributed. PayPal has spent three years trying to make one named stablecoin—PayPal USD—useful enough that consumers and merchants deliberately choose to hold, send, spend and settle in it. Stripe is taking almost the opposite route. It has assembled Bridge, Privy, Treasury, Issuing, Open Issuance and the Tempo blockchain so that a business can use stablecoins underneath a product without requiring its customer to care which token or chain is doing the work.

That distinction matters because both firms already operate at enormous scale. PayPal processed $1.79 trillion of total payment volume in 2025 and had 439 million active accounts. Stripe says businesses on its platform generated $1.9 trillion of payment volume in 2025. The gap in reported payment scale is only about 6%, although the definitions are not identical. The stablecoin contest is therefore not a startup experiment. It is a strategic decision about where two near-$2-trillion payment ecosystems want to capture value next.

Figure 1. Reported 2025 payment scale. Source: PayPal 2025 Form 10-K; Stripe 2025 annual update. Company definitions differ.

The Real Difference: PayPal Wants a Monetary Product; Stripe Wants a Monetary Layer

The easiest way to understand the two approaches is to ask what must be true for each company to win. PayPal benefits most if PYUSD itself becomes a meaningful consumer and merchant balance. More PYUSD means more funds sitting inside the PayPal/Venmo ecosystem, more opportunities for cross-border transfers and settlement, and potentially more economics from reserve income shared by Paxos. PayPal can also use rewards to make holding the stablecoin feel more like a financial product than a crypto feature.

Stripe does not need OUSD to become the only—or even the largest—stablecoin. Its stack is explicitly multi-coin. Stripe says OUSD is now its default stablecoin configuration on Tempo, but businesses can still choose other stablecoins and blockchains and are not required to convert existing balances. Bridge can orchestrate between fiat and multiple stablecoins. Privy can embed wallets. Treasury can hold balances. Issuing can turn stablecoin balances into cards. Global Payouts can move money to recipients. Open Issuance can help a business create its own stablecoin.

That gives Stripe an unusual hedge: if OUSD wins, Stripe participates. If USDC remains dominant, Stripe can still provide infrastructure. If a payroll company launches its own branded stablecoin, Stripe can still provide issuance, reserves, wallets, cards and settlement. In strategic terms, PayPal is more leveraged to the success of one branded monetary asset; Stripe is more leveraged to stablecoin activity as a category.

Figure 2. Strategic architecture: consumer-facing monetary brand versus embedded infrastructure.

PayPal’s Advantage Is Distribution That Already Behaves Like a Wallet

PayPal starts with something crypto-native infrastructure companies usually have to buy or build: a consumer wallet with hundreds of millions of active accounts, a merchant network and a familiar checkout button. In March 2026, PayPal expanded PYUSD availability to 70 markets. Eligible users can buy, hold, send and receive the token inside PayPal, move it to external wallets, convert it back into local currency and—where available—earn rewards. U.S. merchants can also configure part of their PayPal balance to settle automatically into PYUSD.

The 4% reward program is strategically important because it turns PYUSD into a balance-acquisition product. PayPal is not simply asking users to hold a crypto dollar because blockchain settlement is technically elegant. It is paying users to keep the balance inside PayPal. The company’s terms make clear that the reward rate is discretionary and can change or end, which makes it closer to a distribution incentive than a contractual pass-through of the reserve yield.

That distinction also matters economically. PayPal’s crypto terms state that Paxos may share with PayPal Digital interest and other earnings generated on the assets backing PYUSD, while token holders are not entitled to those reserve earnings. Separately, PayPal chooses whether to pay PYUSD rewards to eligible holders. In effect, PayPal sits between reserve economics and consumer acquisition: it can receive some economics from the backing assets and decide how aggressively to recycle value back to users through rewards.

The potential scale of that distribution spend is easy to underestimate. PYUSD’s market capitalization was about $2.91 billion on October 6. If only one-quarter of that supply were held in reward-eligible PayPal accounts at a 4% annual reward rate, the annualized reward bill would be roughly $29 million. At half the supply it would be about $58 million; if every token were eligible, about $117 million. Those figures are illustrative—PayPal does not disclose the eligible balance or exact funding split—but they show why rewards can become a real line of strategic spending rather than a cosmetic feature.

Figure 3. Illustrative PYUSD reward sensitivity using current supply and a 4% annual reward rate. This is not an estimate of PayPal’s actual program cost.

PayPal is also trying to make the token useful outside speculative crypto trading. Its 2026 developer documentation supports merchants accepting crypto from global buyers and settling locally, while refunds can be issued in PYUSD. Hyperwallet supports PYUSD payouts. PYUSD can move off PayPal to external wallets, and the company has spent the past two years adding blockchain and exchange distribution. That reduces the risk that PYUSD becomes a closed-loop loyalty token.

Stripe’s Advantage Is That the User Does Not Need to Know Stablecoins Are There

Stripe’s strongest stablecoin case is almost the inverse of PayPal’s. Deel’s contractor wallet is a useful example. Stripe collects employer payments, Bridge converts dollars into a custom stablecoin, Privy provides the embedded wallet and Tempo settles transactions. The contractor sees a dollar-denominated balance that can be held, rewarded and spent. Stripe explicitly describes Bridge, Privy and Tempo as invisible to the contractor.

This is strategically powerful because infrastructure adoption does not require consumer education. A payroll company, marketplace or remittance app can use stablecoins because they lower cross-border cost or improve settlement speed without asking users to make a crypto decision. Stablecoins become a back-end implementation detail in the same way a merchant rarely asks which correspondent banks moved a card payment.

Stripe Treasury already offered stablecoin-powered financial accounts in 101 countries before OUSD launched. At Sessions 2026, Stripe expanded the model toward a global business account with fiat and stablecoin balances, instant transfers, cards and payouts. Privy, acquired in 2025, powers more than 110 million programmable wallets. Bridge provides stablecoin orchestration and issuance. Tempo gives Stripe a purpose-built payment blockchain. OUSD then sits across that stack as a preferred shared asset rather than the entire strategy.

The difference becomes especially clear in Open Issuance. Stripe is willing to help a business launch a stablecoin that is not called OUSD at all. A platform can create a custom token, choose its reserve structure, earn reserve-derived rewards and connect it to Bridge’s liquidity network. That is the strongest evidence that Stripe’s endgame is not simply “make OUSD beat PYUSD.” It is to own the tools that make stablecoins usable regardless of brand.

Current Supply Says PYUSD Has the Lead — but It Is the Wrong Scoreboard by Itself

PYUSD currently has the much larger circulating supply. CoinGecko showed about $2.91 billion outstanding on October 6, compared with roughly $699 million for OUSD. That is a 4.2-to-1 gap. But OUSD only launched on September 30, so treating the numbers as a mature market-share contest would be misleading. Its initial supply is better viewed as evidence that Open Standard’s founding partners can seed meaningful liquidity quickly.

Figure 4. Current circulating supply. OUSD’s very recent launch makes the comparison directional rather than a mature market-share ranking.

PYUSD’s own supply history is also a warning against using circulating value as a single success metric. CoinGecko’s 2025 annual report put PYUSD at about $3.6 billion at year-end, above today’s roughly $2.9 billion. The token can be deeply integrated into PayPal and still experience changes in supply as yields, DeFi incentives, exchange liquidity and competing stablecoins change. For a payments stablecoin, the better long-term indicators will be payment volume, active balances, merchant settlement, cross-border usage and retention—not market cap alone.

The Most Important Economic Difference Is Who Gets the Reserve Yield

Stablecoins are attractive businesses partly because their reserve assets can earn interest. But PayPal and Open Standard distribute those economics differently, and that choice reveals the intended customer.

This difference produces two distinct flywheels. PayPal can use reserve economics and its own balance sheet to make PYUSD attractive to consumers, which may increase balances and transactions inside PayPal. Open Standard instead tries to make distribution economically rational for other companies by returning reserve revenues to the businesses that grow OUSD. Stripe’s gain can come from the surrounding products those businesses use—Treasury, Bridge, wallets, cards, payouts and payments—rather than from hoarding all reserve economics at the token level.

PayPal’s Moat Is the Consumer Relationship; Stripe’s Moat Is Developer and Merchant Dependency

PayPal can put PYUSD in front of a user without asking a third-party developer to integrate anything. That is rare in stablecoins. A PayPal or Venmo customer can already have identity verification, payment methods, merchant checkout, P2P transfers and transaction history in one place. For retail adoption, that lowers friction more than adding another blockchain integration ever could.

Stripe’s distribution is less visible but potentially more embedded. A fintech can use Stripe to accept a payment, convert it into a stablecoin, hold it in Treasury, place it in an embedded Privy wallet, issue a card against it and pay the recipient in another country. Once that stack is integrated, replacing Stripe is not equivalent to swapping one token contract for another. The dependency moves up from a stablecoin to the operating system for money movement.

The attempted takeover of PayPal in 2026 is revealing in this context. Stripe and Advent made a roughly $53 billion bid in July before abandoning the pursuit in August. The deal never happened, but the strategic logic was obvious: Stripe’s infrastructure scale and PayPal’s consumer wallet distribution are complementary. The failed bid is indirect evidence that Stripe’s largest structural gap is precisely the advantage PayPal already has—a direct relationship with hundreds of millions of consumers.

The Risks Are Different Too

PayPal’s risk is concentration around a branded token. If users prefer USDC, banks issue attractive tokenized deposits, rewards become too expensive, or merchants see little reason to hold PYUSD rather than dollars, PayPal can still process payments—but the stablecoin strategy itself loses leverage. The company also depends on Paxos for issuance and reserve management. PayPal’s filings explicitly note that changing stablecoin regulation could increase compliance costs or force product changes.

Stripe’s risk is the opposite: vertical-stack concentration. Bridge, Privy, Tempo, Treasury, Issuing and OUSD can create powerful economics, but a business that uses all of them may be concentrating wallets, stablecoin issuance, payment processing, blockchain settlement and treasury operations around one vendor ecosystem. Stripe mitigates token-level lock-in by supporting alternatives, yet it is simultaneously increasing infrastructure-level lock-in.

OUSD also introduces governance complexity that PYUSD does not have in the same form. Open Standard is an independent entity founded by Stripe alongside Coinbase, Mastercard, Shopify and Visa, with more than 200 partners. Shared governance and reserve-revenue sharing can accelerate adoption, but they also mean OUSD is not simply a Stripe-controlled asset. That neutrality is a feature for partners and a limitation if investors assume Stripe captures every dollar of OUSD economics.

Which Model Is More Powerful?

There is no useful answer without defining what “powerful” means. For building a consumer monetary brand, PayPal has the clearer advantage. For becoming indispensable infrastructure underneath other financial products, Stripe has the stronger architecture. The comparison looks like this:

On balance, Stripe has the stronger strategic optionality. Its stablecoin business can succeed under several possible futures: OUSD could grow, USDC could remain dominant, fintechs could issue their own coins, or stablecoins could disappear behind bank-like user interfaces. In each case, Stripe can monetize infrastructure around the flow.

PayPal has the more asymmetric consumer upside. If PYUSD becomes a default balance for PayPal and Venmo users—especially for cross-border transfers, merchant settlement and stored value—PayPal could turn an existing payments relationship into something closer to a global digital-dollar account. That would be harder for Stripe to replicate organically because Stripe does not start with the same consumer wallet network.

The most interesting outcome is therefore not necessarily one company defeating the other. It is a market split in which PayPal tries to own the consumer’s digital dollar while Stripe owns the machinery that lets thousands of other companies create their own version of one.

What Investors Should Watch Next

The next 12 to 18 months should make the strategies easier to judge. Circulating supply will matter, but operating metrics will be more informative. The most useful signals are:

• PYUSD balances held inside PayPal and Venmo versus balances circulating primarily on exchanges and DeFi.
• How much U.S. merchant settlement converts automatically into PYUSD and whether the 4% reward rate persists as rates and reserve economics change.
• Cross-border PYUSD usage across the 70-market rollout, including Hyperwallet payouts and conversions back to local currency.
• OUSD transaction activity relative to its circulating supply. A large supply with little payment turnover would be less impressive than a smaller balance reused heavily.
• How many Open Standard partners move from signing up to actively routing payments, treasury balances or cards through OUSD.
• Adoption of Stripe digital asset accounts, Treasury, stablecoin-backed cards and Open Issuance by non-crypto companies.
• Whether Stripe continues to make OUSD the default without reducing support for rival stablecoins—a key test of whether neutrality remains credible.
• Any disclosure showing how much stablecoin activity contributes to revenue, margins or customer retention at either company.

Methodology and Limits

This analysis compares the two companies’ disclosed stablecoin products, distribution surfaces and economic incentives as of October 7, 2026. PayPal is public and reports detailed financial and operating metrics; Stripe is private and discloses less financial detail, so comparisons use Stripe’s published payment-volume and product statistics rather than attempting to estimate undisclosed revenue. PYUSD and OUSD circulating values use CoinGecko data from October 6, 2026. Market capitalization is treated as an adoption indicator, not as a proxy for payment volume or profitability.

The PYUSD reward-cost sensitivity is an original scenario analysis, not a company forecast. It multiplies current PYUSD supply by assumed shares held in reward-eligible PayPal accounts and the currently advertised 4% annual reward rate. Actual eligible balances, reward funding, reserve-revenue sharing and tax treatment are not publicly disclosed in sufficient detail to infer PayPal’s real program cost.

Sources

1. PayPal 2025 Form 10-K — 439M active accounts and $1.79T TPV

2. PayPal Q2 2026 Form 10-Q — $486.4B quarterly TPV and stablecoin risk disclosures

3. PayPal USD product page — 4% rewards, 1:1 redemption and usage

4. PayPal — PYUSD expands to 70 markets

5. PayPal — PYUSD settlement for U.S. merchants

6. PayPal Cryptocurrency Terms — reserve earnings, redemption and rewards terms

7. Paxos — PYUSD transparency and attestations

8. Stripe 2025 annual update — $1.9T volume and Privy scale

9. Stripe — OUSD is now the default stablecoin on Stripe

10. Open Standard — OUSD launch, issuer and reserve partners

11. Open Standard — OUSD economic model and partner reserve economics

12. Stripe — stablecoins for Treasury in 101 countries

13. Stripe — Sessions 2026 product expansion

14. Stripe — Open Issuance from Bridge

15. Stripe — Deel stablecoin wallet case study

16. CoinGecko — PayPal USD market cap and circulating supply

17. CoinGecko — Open USD market cap and circulating supply

18. Reuters — Stripe/Advent abandoned PayPal takeover pursuit in August 2026

Editorial note: Stablecoin products, reward rates, availability and regulation can change quickly. Figures are current to the research date shown above and are not investment advice.

Johan Shamshad

Financial Markets Analyst and Journalist at Dave Finances |  More PostsBio ⮌

Johan Shamshad is a financial markets writer at Dave Finances covering cryptocurrencies, trading platforms, brokers, fintech, financial regulation, and developments across global markets. He previously worked at Gulf News, adding newsroom experience to his coverage of fast-moving financial and digital-asset markets.

His work focuses on identifying market-moving events, company developments, regulatory changes, product launches, and shifts in trading and financial infrastructure.

Johan contributes news and analysis designed to help readers understand not only what happened, but why a development matters and how it may affect the wider financial landscape.

• Johan Shamshad

  Tokenized Stocks vs Real Stocks vs CFDs: What Do Retail Traders Actually Own?
• Johan Shamshad

  Robinhood vs Binance vs Kraken: Who Is Building the Real Everything App?
• Johan Shamshad

  Polymarket vs Kalshi vs Robinhood: Which Prediction Market Works Best for Traders?
• Johan Shamshad

  Trump’s USD1 Plans Payments for Major Online Businesses Through Mesh